Enter your email address to receive updates from Dr. Housing Bubble:



100% Private & Spam Free.
January 2nd, 2008

Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute Culver City. Flipping Homes in Today’s California Housing Market.

It didn’t take the year long for Peak oil folks to see $100. The market didn’t take kindly to the fact that manufacturing was “unexpectedly” lower. Didn’t that hit everyone as a shock? And yes, we still have billions and billions of toxic mortgages ready to implode at any given moment. The only reason many of the bigger lenders and banks are holding any hope is the government is going to issue a full on bailout. In fact, the 10 year is already pricing in another Fed cut at the next meeting. It would seem that the time to buy a house isn’t right now especially if it looks like the Fed is going to cut rates to an absolute bare bones and you shouldn’t be surprised if you see 1 or 0 percent Fed Funds rates in the near future ala Japan. The gold markets love this information jumping up $25 on the first trading day of the year. You would think people would be cautious about buying or flipping homes but leave it to Culver City for another spectacular bubblicious flip into the middle of chaos. Today we salute you Culver City with our Real Home of Genius.

culvercity.jpg

This 700 square foot 2 bedroom 1 bath beauty is a thing to marvel at. You can tell whoever remodeled this place has been watching a lot of Flip this House and Property Ladder. When you look inside you have your typical trendy countertops and upgraded fixtures; you know, the boob job and lipo for homes. The place is very nice and does everything it can do for the gigantic size of 700 square feet. So what is this place selling for in a down market? How about $599,000? Before you dial up your agent, let us take a look at some history on this home.

Sales History:

August of 2007: $452,000

Someone did a great job buying this place at below market value right when the credit crunch was devouring the entire housing market. I’m not sure how the home looked before all these upgrades but I’m sure it needed work. It must of taken a few months to get this home up to par and put it back onto the market. Initially this home was listed as follows:

October 2007: $639,000 to $619,000

December 2007: $619,000 to $599,000

This is such a typical flip and I don’t know how you feel when you watch those flipping shows, but there is absolutely no way the added value by a few cosmetic modifications is worth what people were paying for. Again, this is your typical housing bubble mentality. Just because a greater fool is going to pay more than you doesn’t mean there is any economic sense in what you are doing. In fact, I would add that the large number of flippers contributed to this bubble craze and are part of the reason the market is now tanking. Clearly this home wasn’t purchased to live in. It was bought as a flip with the intention that the added value of a few upgrades was going to yield them a large sum of money in two months! Let us do some rough math like they do on those shows:

Purchase Price: $452,000

Budget to Fix: $50,000 (I’m estimating here on my own experiences in real estate with contractors and really, how much can you do with 700 square feet?)

Sales Price: $639,000

Commission: $32,000 (5% at going market sentiment)

Total Profit: $105,000

Damn! You mean we can all make $51,000 per month simply by arranging a team of sub-contractors, adding a bit of paint, going to Home Depot for your typical countertops, and adding some stainless steel appliances? Where do we all sign up! Folks, this is precisely the reason why we are in the mess we are in. For this entire decade, it was so easy to bamboozle buyers into a home since prices were going up through the roof. It was possible to finance anything and everything while using other people’s money (OPM). Once a thing for savvy fast talking investors and late night infomercials, this became so mainstream that at one point in California 70 percent of all loans were adjustable rate mortgages.

Unfortunately in any bubble, people will make tons of money and people will lose tons of money. What those flipping shows don’t tell you is what happens once a real estate market crashes. Their projections are absolutely absurd and I wonder how many of those shows will remain once the dust settles in a few years. Once you sign that contract, that home is all in your name. Let us run the numbers but with the current real life scenario:

Purchase Price: $452,000

Budget to Fix: $50,000

Sales Price: $599,000

Carrying Cost: $12,720 *(4 month carrying cost assuming 6 percent loan)

Commission: $29,900 (5% at going market sentiment)

Total Profit: $54,380

Suddenly it doesn’t seem so easy to make quick money especially when there is a glut of homes hitting the market and credit is much harder to come by. The bad news for this flipper is the current market is declining fast in this area:

Median Price Per Square Foot

Q1 2007: $546.44

Q2 2007: $573.3

Q3 2007: $634.24

Q4 2007: $578.25

Sales

Q1 2007: 12

Q2 2007: 15

Q3 2007: 14

Q4 2007: 5

Even at fourth quarter price per square foot, this home should sell for slightly over $400,000. If today’s market is any indication, we are going to have a lot of what we had in the third and fourth quarter of 2007.

Today we salute you Culver City with our Real Home of Genius Award.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information


* * * * ½ 8 votes

Related Posts:


Real Homes of Genius: Culver City Pricing Dysfunction! Prices all Over the 405.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Buena Park. $511,000 for 864 Square Feet. Even Knott’s Berry Farm is Cheaper!
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute Inglewood. Bought in 1970 for $20,000 now selling for $397,400.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Baldwin Park. When you Only Need to Show Concrete to Sell at $400,000+.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?

RSS feed

13 comments »

Comment by Laura Louzader
MyAvatars 0.2

January 2nd, 2008 at 12:39 pm

NO WAY can this shack cost $400K.

That is over $400 a sq ft for something that is unfit to store your lawnmower in.

 
Comment by Robbie
MyAvatars 0.2

January 2nd, 2008 at 3:59 pm

I really enjoy reading your website every day. Keep up the good work! And I don’t even live in California!

 
Comment by nonamerequired
MyAvatars 0.2

January 2nd, 2008 at 6:14 pm

I have an idea I’m pitching to TLC.
It’s called “Lose This House,” where we track certain foreclosures, and follow the borrower/owner, as they file for divorce, divide up their debts, and go about the process of finding a place to rent.

 
Comment by Steve
MyAvatars 0.2

January 2nd, 2008 at 7:37 pm

@ Nonamerequired

I caught a slight typo in your post.. “finding a place to rent” should read “finding two places to rent”…

I think this is how they plan to fix it. If all 2 million couples being foreclosed on get divorced and each need two homes, it’s all fixed.

Now let’s see.. Before they had a combined $90K income and could stretch to a $300K home. Now each one makes $45K so this 700 sq foot shack can go for a max of $135K.

I’ll know I’m right if the NAHB starts offering “free marriage counseling”

Seriously though.. This shed would go for $50-60K max in my city.

 
Comment by Tyrone
MyAvatars 0.2

January 2nd, 2008 at 8:50 pm

Well, if you bought last year,….

You’ll be priced IN forever!

LOL

 
Comment by SoCalWatcher
MyAvatars 0.2

January 2nd, 2008 at 9:00 pm

700sq ft…. $600K…

What in the hee haw hell is wrong here?

 
Comment by MannyinMiami
MyAvatars 0.2

January 2nd, 2008 at 10:48 pm

I wouldn’t allow my dog to sleep in that dump, much less find it suitable for human habitation.

 
Comment by Debbie Beukema
MyAvatars 0.2

January 3rd, 2008 at 6:07 am

…”the boob job and lipo for homes”"”

-F’in’ hilarious :)

 
Comment by keith
MyAvatars 0.2

January 3rd, 2008 at 10:03 am

remember this profit short term ‘ordinary’ income so subtract another 50% for taxes as you can’t 1031 flips and a regular job without the risk looks a lot better!

 
Comment by Curt
MyAvatars 0.2

January 3rd, 2008 at 10:55 am

My, My, My, what a beauty! Is it that much of a privilege to live in Culver City? I see i n the weather where there’s a rain storm coming. Looking at that roof, it makes one wonder if it will shed water. They may need to sell it before the next storm hits. Someone has lost touch with reality here. I hope its not me!

 
Comment by speedingpullet
MyAvatars 0.2

January 5th, 2008 at 1:12 pm

I really like the ‘ stone-dead plants in front’ touch, don’t you?

Sadly, $600K is about par with other wishing prices in Culver City.

I wish I could fast-forward to Jan 2009, to a) avoid the frakking Primaries - I’m sick of all the candidates on both sides already, and b) find a house on Westside for less than half a million dollars that I could swing a cat in.
Sigh.

 
Comment by parttypinreno
MyAvatars 0.2

January 8th, 2008 at 9:44 am

This comment is regarding the january 8th 2008 post referring to seasonal workers, I wondered if you factored in the fact that some of these employers out there are keeping their seasonal workers on a partime basis only instead of hiring them full time they often cut their hours back and keep them on as standby with barely enough hours to get by on in the real world …I noticed a lot of them hire most helpers as part time workers these days if you think about it if they have 400 workers working 20 hours a week verses 200 workers working 40 hours a week they still only have 200 workers working for them but by keeping them partime it keeps the numbers up if we factor in what they are paying out wed get a lot better job report, its not how many people that are working it should count more towards how much money is shelled out now theres another pie chart we have yet to see no?

 
Comment by Will
MyAvatars 0.2

March 11th, 2008 at 6:14 pm

Great post! This is so true and now a lot of these greedy investors who contributed to the problem are now paying for it. It is absurd that a home of that size could go for even $250K, let alone $600k
I invest for long term and therefore purchase not on speculation but buy and hold fundamentals. It is fun, lower risk, and much more profitable plus the tax loopholes are never-ending. Anyone interested go to my website at
www.nationwidepropertyinvestments.com

 

What do you think? Join the discussion...

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
Website
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)


 
Close
E-mail It
    The content on Dr. Housing Bubble Blog is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) who may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

    Real Estate Blogs - Blog Top Sites
© 2007 Dr. Housing Bubble
Design by Unique Blog Designs