<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Option ARMs Come Back into Center Stage:  350,000 Active Option ARMs with over 200,000 in California.  78 Percent of Option ARMs have yet to hit Recast Dates.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/option-arms-come-back-into-center-stage-350000-active-option-arms-with-over-200000-in-california-73-percent-of-option-arms-have-yet-to-hit-recast-dates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/option-arms-come-back-into-center-stage-350000-active-option-arms-with-over-200000-in-california-73-percent-of-option-arms-have-yet-to-hit-recast-dates/</link>
	<description>How I Learned to Love Southern California and Forget the Housing Bubble</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kid Charlemagne</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/option-arms-come-back-into-center-stage-350000-active-option-arms-with-over-200000-in-california-73-percent-of-option-arms-have-yet-to-hit-recast-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-42870</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid Charlemagne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=2729#comment-42870</guid>
		<description>@Jag
The &#039;Reset&#039; is not the problem.  The &#039;Recast&#039; is.  Many took out loans with negative amoratization, meaning the equity in the home is becoming more negative.  They can recast on a timeline, or it can be triggerred by an event, such as debt-to-equity.  (In engineering, you cannot divide by zero, but you can in voodoo banking-realty &#039;math&#039;).  The recast recalculates the entire loan and you have to pay principle and interest going forward, plus anything else in the contract, because if you got one of these, you damn sure were too stupid to read the contract and have no idea what you signed.
What pulled the world back from the abyss was not the bailouts, it was changing the accounting rules from mark-to-market, back to mark-to-freaking-anything-I-want to.  Now the banks are technically no longer insolvent, although we all know they really are.  If housing were truly marked to undistorted market, all hell would break loose.  
Derivatives are now over a quadrillion, or more than 10 times this planet&#039;s GDP (which is a fabricated number).  Honestly, when these formulas reach the end point do you believe the Fed will back-stop a quadrillion?  Remember algebra and a parabolic curve?  They look awesome, until they don&#039;t. Whatever you&#039;ve heard, a derivative is not &#039;derived&#039; from something.  It is a calculus formula: Dx/Dt, or a change in quantity x with respect to delta-time.  They play the rate of change rather than the integral of accumulated value over time.  The end-game is a retrace as violent as the one that got them there.  As x approaches infinity, the formula begins to fail.  Maddock approched infinity.  There was no where else to go...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jag<br />
The &#8216;Reset&#8217; is not the problem.  The &#8216;Recast&#8217; is.  Many took out loans with negative amoratization, meaning the equity in the home is becoming more negative.  They can recast on a timeline, or it can be triggerred by an event, such as debt-to-equity.  (In engineering, you cannot divide by zero, but you can in voodoo banking-realty &#8216;math&#8217;).  The recast recalculates the entire loan and you have to pay principle and interest going forward, plus anything else in the contract, because if you got one of these, you damn sure were too stupid to read the contract and have no idea what you signed.<br />
What pulled the world back from the abyss was not the bailouts, it was changing the accounting rules from mark-to-market, back to mark-to-freaking-anything-I-want to.  Now the banks are technically no longer insolvent, although we all know they really are.  If housing were truly marked to undistorted market, all hell would break loose.<br />
Derivatives are now over a quadrillion, or more than 10 times this planet&#8217;s GDP (which is a fabricated number).  Honestly, when these formulas reach the end point do you believe the Fed will back-stop a quadrillion?  Remember algebra and a parabolic curve?  They look awesome, until they don&#8217;t. Whatever you&#8217;ve heard, a derivative is not &#8216;derived&#8217; from something.  It is a calculus formula: Dx/Dt, or a change in quantity x with respect to delta-time.  They play the rate of change rather than the integral of accumulated value over time.  The end-game is a retrace as violent as the one that got them there.  As x approaches infinity, the formula begins to fail.  Maddock approched infinity.  There was no where else to go&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/option-arms-come-back-into-center-stage-350000-active-option-arms-with-over-200000-in-california-73-percent-of-option-arms-have-yet-to-hit-recast-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-42836</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=2729#comment-42836</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think they are being all that strict with the 125% LTV ratio for HAMP.  My loan balance on my first is about 300k(another 85k on the 2nd) with a house that is worth 150k and they offered me a HAMP mod.  Of course HAMP doesn&#039;t address negative equity or my 2nd so I&#039;m probably not going to accept it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they are being all that strict with the 125% LTV ratio for HAMP.  My loan balance on my first is about 300k(another 85k on the 2nd) with a house that is worth 150k and they offered me a HAMP mod.  Of course HAMP doesn&#8217;t address negative equity or my 2nd so I&#8217;m probably not going to accept it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/option-arms-come-back-into-center-stage-350000-active-option-arms-with-over-200000-in-california-73-percent-of-option-arms-have-yet-to-hit-recast-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-42817</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=2729#comment-42817</guid>
		<description>Lots of these had a reset of 110% so they are already resetting, many that I have seen had Interest only seconds behind them to 95 or 100% LTV from the original appraised value. So many of these people owe double what their homes are worth now its crazy. The good news is that buyers should have plenty of inventory to chose from coming up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of these had a reset of 110% so they are already resetting, many that I have seen had Interest only seconds behind them to 95 or 100% LTV from the original appraised value. So many of these people owe double what their homes are worth now its crazy. The good news is that buyers should have plenty of inventory to chose from coming up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/option-arms-come-back-into-center-stage-350000-active-option-arms-with-over-200000-in-california-73-percent-of-option-arms-have-yet-to-hit-recast-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-42816</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=2729#comment-42816</guid>
		<description>Martin Armstrong suggests the year 2033 as the bottom, with an intervening &quot;relief rally&quot; beginning in 2012. Happy hunting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin Armstrong suggests the year 2033 as the bottom, with an intervening &#8220;relief rally&#8221; beginning in 2012. Happy hunting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorie</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/option-arms-come-back-into-center-stage-350000-active-option-arms-with-over-200000-in-california-73-percent-of-option-arms-have-yet-to-hit-recast-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-42806</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=2729#comment-42806</guid>
		<description>A lot of the World Savings/Wachovia option ARMs recast after 5 years, not ten. Since most of those were made in 06/07 the recasts dates are coming right up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of the World Savings/Wachovia option ARMs recast after 5 years, not ten. Since most of those were made in 06/07 the recasts dates are coming right up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
