<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DataQuick News: Much Ado About Nothing?</title>
	<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/dataquick-news-much-ado-about-nothing/</link>
	<description>How I Learned to Love Southern California and Forget the Housing Bubble</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Housing Bubble</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/dataquick-news-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-62</link>
		<author>Dr Housing Bubble</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/dataquick-news-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>bubble_watcher:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I get that sense too.  If anything, they can refer to their data by saying "in October of 2006" we changed our wording to reflect the suspicion that the market would turn south.  Somehow feel like CYA but the C.A.R. is also doing this predicting a -2% drop in California for 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bubble_watcher:</p>
<p>I get that sense too.  If anything, they can refer to their data by saying &#8220;in October of 2006&#8243; we changed our wording to reflect the suspicion that the market would turn south.  Somehow feel like CYA but the C.A.R. is also doing this predicting a -2% drop in California for 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubble_watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/dataquick-news-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-57</link>
		<author>bubble_watcher</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/dataquick-news-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Is DataQuick gearing up for another 1992-1995 campaign? Or maybe my eyes deceive me and there is nothing to see here and I should lay off the peyote. So what do you think of this? &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It looks like DataQuick is starting to 'batten down the hatches'..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Is DataQuick gearing up for another 1992-1995 campaign? Or maybe my eyes deceive me and there is nothing to see here and I should lay off the peyote. So what do you think of this? </i></p>
<p>It looks like DataQuick is starting to &#8216;batten down the hatches&#8217;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/dataquick-news-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-52</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/dataquick-news-much-ado-about-nothing/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I'm surprised many did not pick up on this.  The market is going down faster than I had thought.  Maybe by December we'll be negative for the yr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised many did not pick up on this.  The market is going down faster than I had thought.  Maybe by December we&#8217;ll be negative for the yr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
