<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real City of Genius – Culver City has a More Expensive Income to Home Ratio than Beverly Hills.  Inflated Markets set to Adjust.  $925,000 Home can be Rented for $4,500.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/culver-city-more-expensive-beverly-hills-home-price-rent-ratio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/culver-city-more-expensive-beverly-hills-home-price-rent-ratio/</link>
	<description>How I Learned to Love Southern California and Forget the Housing Bubble</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OC Beach</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/culver-city-more-expensive-beverly-hills-home-price-rent-ratio/#comment-47766</link>
		<dc:creator>OC Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=3186#comment-47766</guid>
		<description>Well it is a part time job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it is a part time job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OC Beach</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/culver-city-more-expensive-beverly-hills-home-price-rent-ratio/#comment-47764</link>
		<dc:creator>OC Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=3186#comment-47764</guid>
		<description>I read that the average salary for teachers is $57,000 but still not bad for a part time job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that the average salary for teachers is $57,000 but still not bad for a part time job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug N</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/culver-city-more-expensive-beverly-hills-home-price-rent-ratio/#comment-46666</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=3186#comment-46666</guid>
		<description>Great post, FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/culver-city-more-expensive-beverly-hills-home-price-rent-ratio/#comment-46664</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=3186#comment-46664</guid>
		<description>Just a note.  The &quot;1%&quot; monthly rent mentioned in the blog post is not enough.  Across the US, in virtually every market, multi-year studies have found that landlord expenses typically run about 45%-50% of the rental income stream.  This number varies a lot from month to month, due to various circumstances but over time it tends to average out to that.  Due to that investors that are looking to make sound investments and not take major chances of a certain property failing must typically seek at least about 2% of the purchase price per month in rental income so as to pay for expenses (including the mortgage and lost opportunity expenses on any cash laid out) and still make a profit for the trouble.  Although always do your numbers, I found nice areas in western NYS requiring at least a 3%/month.

On a simple example on a 1%/month property you&#039;d make about 12%/year.

Over that same year your expenses run:

6%/year - property operating expenses
6%/year - mortgage interest and lost opportunity costs on the purchase price

Oh well your now out of cash.  :-(  No payment for your trouble.  And the above is assuming a really, really low rate for an investment property and only counts the interest.  You will have to lay out payments towards the principle every month.  Willing to do that on an &quot;investment&quot; with no profit?  And btw, the size of the down payment does not matter.  Whatever extra monthly income you make by having a larger down payment is lost in lost opportunity costs on that cash.

On a 2% property you have a decent investment, assuming you do not manage it badly.

On 2% you make a 24% income stream over the year.

12%/year - property operating expenses
6%/year - mortgage interest and lost opportunity costs on the purchase price

This leaves you with about a 6% return on the money you have at risk, with room for a reasonable interest rate, your principle payments covered, and breathing room in case something goes wrong.

More realistic example.

12%/year - property operating expenses
7%/year - mortgage interest and lost opportunity costs on the purchase price
~3%/year - approx average payment of principle payments.

~2% cash return on your investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note.  The &#8220;1%&#8221; monthly rent mentioned in the blog post is not enough.  Across the US, in virtually every market, multi-year studies have found that landlord expenses typically run about 45%-50% of the rental income stream.  This number varies a lot from month to month, due to various circumstances but over time it tends to average out to that.  Due to that investors that are looking to make sound investments and not take major chances of a certain property failing must typically seek at least about 2% of the purchase price per month in rental income so as to pay for expenses (including the mortgage and lost opportunity expenses on any cash laid out) and still make a profit for the trouble.  Although always do your numbers, I found nice areas in western NYS requiring at least a 3%/month.</p>
<p>On a simple example on a 1%/month property you&#8217;d make about 12%/year.</p>
<p>Over that same year your expenses run:</p>
<p>6%/year &#8211; property operating expenses<br />
6%/year &#8211; mortgage interest and lost opportunity costs on the purchase price</p>
<p>Oh well your now out of cash.  <img src='http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />   No payment for your trouble.  And the above is assuming a really, really low rate for an investment property and only counts the interest.  You will have to lay out payments towards the principle every month.  Willing to do that on an &#8220;investment&#8221; with no profit?  And btw, the size of the down payment does not matter.  Whatever extra monthly income you make by having a larger down payment is lost in lost opportunity costs on that cash.</p>
<p>On a 2% property you have a decent investment, assuming you do not manage it badly.</p>
<p>On 2% you make a 24% income stream over the year.</p>
<p>12%/year &#8211; property operating expenses<br />
6%/year &#8211; mortgage interest and lost opportunity costs on the purchase price</p>
<p>This leaves you with about a 6% return on the money you have at risk, with room for a reasonable interest rate, your principle payments covered, and breathing room in case something goes wrong.</p>
<p>More realistic example.</p>
<p>12%/year &#8211; property operating expenses<br />
7%/year &#8211; mortgage interest and lost opportunity costs on the purchase price<br />
~3%/year &#8211; approx average payment of principle payments.</p>
<p>~2% cash return on your investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/culver-city-more-expensive-beverly-hills-home-price-rent-ratio/#comment-46660</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/?p=3186#comment-46660</guid>
		<description>Per NEA, avg salary for a teacher in California is $65,808.

http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/010rankings.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per NEA, avg salary for a teacher in California is $65,808.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/010rankings.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/010rankings.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.doctorhousingbubble.com @ 2012-02-08 21:51:37 -->
